1.深圳市龙岗区第三人民医院超声科,广东 深圳 518115
2.深圳市龙岗区人民医院超声科,广东 深圳518115
3.中山大学附属第三医院超声科,广东 广州510630
郑剑,博士研究生,副主任医师,研究方向:腹部浅表超声诊断与介入治疗、肝纤维化无创评估,E-mail:zhengj58@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2020-07-15,
收稿日期:2020-02-17,
扫 描 看 全 文
郑剑,吴曼丽,王青娟等.声触诊弹性成像与二维剪切波弹性成像检测肝脏硬度的比较[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2020,41(04):644-648.
ZHENG Jian,WU Man-li,WANG Qing-juan,et al.Liver Stiffness Assessment by Sound Touch Elastography versus Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography: a Comparative Study[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2020,41(04):644-648.
郑剑,吴曼丽,王青娟等.声触诊弹性成像与二维剪切波弹性成像检测肝脏硬度的比较[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2020,41(04):644-648. DOI:
ZHENG Jian,WU Man-li,WANG Qing-juan,et al.Liver Stiffness Assessment by Sound Touch Elastography versus Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography: a Comparative Study[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2020,41(04):644-648. DOI:
目的
2
将声触诊弹性成像(STE)和二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)检测肝脏硬度进行比较,为STE新技术的临床应用提供循证依据。
方法
2
采用 STE和2D-SWE技术,对43例健康志愿者和63例肝硬化患者行肝硬度检测,对比分析两种技术的检测成功率、操作者内重复性、测值相关性和测值差异。
结果
2
肝脏STE、2D-SWE检测成功率分别为100%(106/106)、96.2%(102/106)(
χ
2
=2.320,
P
=0.128),4例2D-SWE检测失败的均为肝硬化患者。在健康组STE测值高于2D-SWE[5.83(5.30~6.37) kPa
vs
5.00(4.80~5.20) kPa,
Z
=4.419,
P
<
0.001]、肝硬化组低于2D-SWE [15.82(11.71~25.02) kPa
vs
18.50(11.95~29.93) kPa,
Z
=-2.981,
P
=0.003]。STE和2D-SWE两种技术的测值相关系数为0.896(95%CI:0.849~0.928,
P
<
0.001)。
结论
2
STE检测成功率高、重复性好,尤其在肝硬化患者穿透性好、与2D-SWE比较更具优势;STE测值与2D-SWE不直接等同,临床应用中需要注意。
Objective
2
To compare sound touch elastography (STE)
a new technique for the measurement of liver stiffness
and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE)
and to provide an evidence base for STE’s clinical practice.
Methods
2
The study included forty-three healthy volunteers and sixty-three patients with liver cirrhosis
in which liver stiffness was measured by means of STE and 2D-SWE. We compared the technical success rate
intra-operator reproducibility and liver stiffness values.
Results
2
The success rates of STE and 2D-SWE were 100% (106/106) and 96.2% (102/106)
respectively (
χ
2
=2.320,
P
=0.128)
with four 2D-SWE examination failures in four patients with liver cirrhosis. Compared with those assessed by 2D-SWE
liver stiffness values assessed by STE were higher [5.83 (5.30~6.37) kPa
vs.
5.00 (4.80~5.20) kPa
Z
=4.419
P
<
0.001] in the healthy group
but lower [15.82 (11.71~25.02) kPa
vs.
18.50 (11.95~29.93) kPa
Z
=-2.981
P
=0.003] in the liver cirrhosis group. The Spearman′s rank correlation coefficient of STE and 2D-SWE was 0.896 (95%CI:0.849~0.928,
P
<
0.001).
Conclusion
2
With equally good reproducibility
STE is superior to 2D-SWE due to its higher success rate and better penetration especially in patients with cirrhosis. The liver stiffness values assessed by STE and 2D-SWE are not equivalent
which deserves our special attention in clinical application.
声触诊弹性成像二维剪切波弹性成像肝脏硬度肝硬化
sound touch elastography (STE)two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE)liver stiffnessliver cirrhosis
中国肝炎防治基金会,中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会肝病学分会和中国研究型医院学会肝病专业委员会.瞬时弹性成像技术诊断肝纤维化专家共识(2018年更新版)[J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2019, 27(3): 182-191.
Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control; Chinese Society of Infectious Disease and Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Liver Disease Committee of Chinese Research Hospital Association. Consensus on clinical application of transient elastography detecting liver fibrosis: a 2018 update [J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2019, 27(3): 182-191.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection[J]. J Hepatol, 2017, 67(2): 370-398.
Zhang L, Xu J, Wu H, et al. Screening breast lesions using shear modulus and its 1-mm shell in sound touch elastography[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2019, 45(3): 710-719.
Gatos I, Drazinos P, Yarmenitis S, et al. Comparison of sound touch elastography, shear wave elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography in chronic liver disease assessment using liver biopsy as the "reference standard”[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(4):959-971.
Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study[J]. Hepatology, 2012, 56(6): 2125-2133.
中华医学会超声医学分会介入超声学组弹性成像评估肝纤维化专家组.二维剪切波弹性成像评估慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化临床应用指南[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2017, 26(11): 921-927.
Panel of Elastography Assessment of Liver Fibrosis,Study Group of Interventional Ultrasound,Society of Ultrasound in Medicine of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for clinical application of two--dimensional shear wave elastography in assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B [J]. Chin J Ultrasonogr, 2017, 26(11): 921-927.
郑剑,吴曼丽,钟梅,等. 声触诊弹性成像和声触诊弹性测量检测肝、脾硬度可行性研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2019, 28(7): 617-620.
Zheng J, Wu ML, Zhong M, et al. The applicability of sound touch elastography and sound touch quantify in measuring liver and spleen stiffness [J]. Chin J Ultrasonogr, 2019, 28(7): 617-620.
Zheng J, Guo HY, Zeng J, et al. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography and conventional US: the optimal evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis[J]. Radiology, 2015, 275(1): 290-300.
中华医学会感染病学分会, 中华医学会肝病学分会.慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版)[J]. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(4): 5-28.
Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association. The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B: a 2019 update[J]. Chin J Liver Dis, 2019, 11(4): 5-28.
中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组,中国医师协会脂肪性肝病专家委员会.非酒精性脂肪性肝病防治指南(2018更新版)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2018, 26(3): 195-203.
National Workshop on Fatty Liver and Alcoholic Liver Disease, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Fatty Liver Expert Committee,Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelines of prevention and treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 2018 update [J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2018, 26(3): 195-203.
World Health Organization. Global hepatitis report 2017. Geneva[R/OL]. (2019-04-04)[2019-11-06]. https://www.who.int/hepatitis/ publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/en/https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/en/.
Castera L, Foucher J, P-HBernard, et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations[J]. Hepatology, 2010, 51(3): 828-835.
Ferraioli G, VW-SWong, Castera L, et al. Liver ultrasound elastography: an update to the world federation for ultrasound in medicine and biology guidelines and recommendations[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2018, 44(12): 2419-2440.
Xia S, Ren X, Ni Z, et al. A noninvasive method-shear-wave elastography compared with transient elastography in evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2019, 35(2): 147-152.
Piscaglia F, Salvatore V, Mulazzani L, et al. Ultrasound shear wave elastography for liver disease. a critical appraisal of the many actors on the stage[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2016, 37(1): 1-5.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构