中山大学肿瘤防治中心妇科,广东 广州 510060
赖月容,学士,主管护师,研究方向:妇科恶性肿瘤,E-mail:laiyr@sysucc.org.cn
收稿:2022-04-18,
纸质出版:2022-07-20
移动端阅览
赖月容,姜月,黄欣等.复发/转移宫颈癌患者应用PD-1抑制剂卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿帕替尼治疗的患者报告结局[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2022,43(04):591-599.
LAI Yue-rong,JIANG Yue,HUANG Xin,et al.Patient-Reported Outcomes of PD-1 Inhibitor Camrelizumab Combined with Antiangiogenic Drug Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2022,43(04):591-599.
赖月容,姜月,黄欣等.复发/转移宫颈癌患者应用PD-1抑制剂卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿帕替尼治疗的患者报告结局[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2022,43(04):591-599. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2022.0409.
LAI Yue-rong,JIANG Yue,HUANG Xin,et al.Patient-Reported Outcomes of PD-1 Inhibitor Camrelizumab Combined with Antiangiogenic Drug Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Cervical Cancer[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2022,43(04):591-599. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2022.0409.
目的
2
本科室既往一项多中心、单臂Ⅱ期临床研究报道了复发/转移宫颈癌患者接受PD-1抑制剂卡瑞利珠单抗联合抗血管生成药物阿帕替尼治疗后的有效性和安全性。本研究旨在报告该宫颈癌队列的患者报告结局(PRO)的结果。
方法
2
对纳入本研究的患者以面对面的方式进行问卷宫颈癌量表(FACT-Cx)的填写,评估时间包括用药前(基线)及每两个用药周期1次,直至患者出现疾病进展,未出现疾病进展者问卷收集时间截止至2020年10月12日。
结果
2
本研究有41例患者至少完成1份FACT-Cx问卷。患者基线、用药后前6周期及治疗6个周期后(范围7-15周期)的生活质量评分分别为114.53±18.23、124.08±15.23和132.82±21.97。结果显示,用药后前6个周期、治疗6个周期后生活质量均显著高于患者的基线生活质量水平(
P
<0.05)。FACT-Cx问卷的四个维度,包括生理状况维度(如精神状态、肢体疼痛等)、情感状况(如悲伤、紧张程度等)、功能状况(如日常活动能力等)及附加关注(如性功能等),在治疗6个周期后的各维度均分显著高于基线各维度的均分(
P
<0.05)。但社会/家庭状况维度(如家庭关系等)变化不显著。用药后前6个周期,3~4级不良反应(AEs)发生率为71.11%。而治疗6个周期后,3~4级AEs发生率显著下降至25.0%,其中高血压、疲劳等AEs发生率明显下降。
结论
2
复发性宫颈癌患者接受卡瑞利珠单抗联合阿帕替尼治疗后,FACT-Cx调查量表在生理状况、情感状况、功能状况及附加关注等多个维度的评分均有升高,生活质量明显提高。并且,生活质量评分在治疗6个周期后较前6个治疗周期仍有升高,提示生活质量改善时间持久。
Objective
2
A previous multicenter, single-arm phase Ⅱ clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab in combination with the antiangiogenic drug apatinib in patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. In the current study, we aimed to report the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with advanced cervical cancer.
Methods
2
The researchers filled out quality of life questionnaire FACT-Cx with the patients face-to-face at the baseline and every two treatment cycles. The patients provided the questionnaire until disease progression. For patients who continued the study, the data cutoff date for the questionnaire was Oct12, 2020.
Results
2
In this study, 41 patients who received treatment finished at least one FACT-Cx questionnaire. The scores of FACT-Cx questionnaire at baseline, the first 6 cycles, and after 6 cycles of treatment (range, 7-15cycle) were 114.53±18.23, 124.08±15.23 and 132.82±21.97, respectively. The scores of questionnaire at the first 6 cycle and after 6 cycles of treatment were significantly increased when compared with those at baseline (
P
<0.05). With respect to each dimension of the FACT-Cx questionnaire, physical status (such as mental state, limb pain), emotional status (such as sadness, tension), functional status (such as daily activities) and additional concerns (such as sexual function), the average scores of these dimensions was significantly higher after 6 treatment cycles than those at baseline (
P
<
0.05). Social/family status dimensions (such as family relationships) did not change significantly. In the first 6 cycles, the incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) was 71.11%. However, the incidence of grade 3 to 4 AEs decreased significantly to 25.0% after 6 treatment cycles, with the frequencies of hypertension and fatigue decreasing significantly.
Conclusions
2
Camrelizumab combined with apatinib significantly improves the overall quality of life of patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. The scores of FACT-Cx questionnaire in multiple dimensions, such as physiological status, emotional status, functional status, and the additional status were significantly increased. Moreover, the questionnaire scores still increase after 6 treatment cycles compared with those of the first 6 cycles, indicating that the improvement of quality of life is durable.
Sung H , Ferlay J , Siegel RL , et al . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin , 2021 , 71 ( 3 ): 209 - 249 .
Zhao M , Wu Q , Hao Y , et al . Global, regional, and national burden of cervical cancer for 195 countries and territories, 2007-2017: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 [J]. BMC Womens Health , 2021 , 21 ( 1 ): 419 .
Quinn M , Benedet J , Odicino F , et al . Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet , 2006 , 95 Suppl 1 : S43 - S103 .
Morris M , Eifel P , Lu J , et al . Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J]. N Engl J Med , 1999 , 340 ( 15 ): 1137 - 1143 .
Frenel J , Le Tourneau C , O'Neil B , et al . Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced, programmed death ligand 1-positive cervical cancer: results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 trial [J]. J Clin Oncol , 2017 , 35 ( 36 ): 4035 - 4041 .
Monk BJ , Sill MW , Burger RA , et al . Phase Ⅱ trial of bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study [J]. J Clin Oncol , 2009 , 27 ( 7 ): 1069 - 1074 .
Garcia AA , Blessing JA , Vaccarello L , et al . Phase Ⅱ clinical trial of docetaxel in refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study [J]. Am J Clin Oncol , 2007 , 30 ( 4 ): 428 - 431 .
Bookman M , Blessing J , Hanjani P , et al . Topotecan in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A phase II study of the gynecologic oncology group [J]. Gynecol Oncol , 2000 , 77 ( 3 ): 446 - 449 .
Boussios S , Seraj E , Zarkavelis G , et al . Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: where do we stand? a literature review [J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol , 2016 , 108 : 164 - 174 .
Turinetto M , Valsecchi AA , Tuninetti V , et al . Immunotherapy for cervical cancer: are we ready for prime time? [J]. Int J Mol Sci , 2022 , 23 ( 7 ).
Brahmer J , Reckamp KL , Baas P , et al . Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med , 2015 , 373 ( 2 ): 123 - 135 .
Fukumura D , Kloepper J , Amoozgar Z , et al . Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol , 2018 , 15 ( 5 ): 325 - 340 .
Rini BI , Plimack ER , Stus V , et al . Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma [J]. N Engl J Med , 2019 , 380 ( 12 ): 1116 - 1127 .
Xu J , Zhang Y , Jia R , et al . Anti-PD-1 Antibody SHR-1210 combined with Apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric, or esophagogastric junction cancer: an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study [J]. Clin Cancer Res , 2019 , 25 ( 2 ): 515 - 523 .
Lan C , Shen J , Wang Y , et al . Camrelizumab plus Apatinib in patients with advanced cervical cancer (CLAP): a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase Ⅱ trial [J]. J Clin Oncol , 2020 , 38 ( 34 ): 4095 - 4106 .
张力苹 , 张启周 , 金军 , 等 . 安罗替尼联合AN方案一线治疗晚期EGFR、ALK及ROS1野生型肺腺癌的疗效 [J]. 广东医学 , 2021 , 42 ( 2 ): 151 - 156 .
Zhang LP , Zhang QZ , Jin J , et al . Clinical observation of Anlotinib combined with Pemetrexed and Nedaplatin in treating EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutation-negative advanced lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Guangdong Med J , 2021 , 42 ( 2 ): 151 - 156 .
Pereira H , Bouattour M , Dioguardi BM , et al . Health-related quality of life in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by either radioembolisation or sorafenib (SARAH trial) [J]. Eur J Cancer , 2021 , 154 : 46 - 56 .
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research ; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research ; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health . Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance [J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes , 2006 , 4 : 79 .
Fregnani CM , Fregnani JH , DOLMDias , et al . Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cervix questionnaire in Brazil [J]. PLoS One , 2013 , 8 ( 10 ): e77947 .
Cella DF , Tulsky DS , Gray G , et al . The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure [J]. J Clin Oncol , 1993 , 11 ( 3 ): 570 - 579 .
万崇华 , 孟琼 , 汤学良 , 等 . 癌症患者生命质量测定量表FACT-G中文版评介 [J]. 实用肿瘤杂志 , 2006 ( 1 ): 77 - 80 .
Wan CH , Meng Q , Tang XL , et al . Review of the Chinese version of the FACT-G scale for measuring quality of life in cancer patients [J]. J Pract Oncol , 2006 ( 1 ): 77 - 80 .
Fish ML , Grover R , Schwarz GS . Quality-of-Life outcomes in surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review [J]. JAMA Surg , 2020 , 155 ( 6 ): 513 - 519 .
Binotto M , Reinert T , Werutsky G , et al . Health-related quality of life before and during chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer [J]. Ecancermedicalscience , 2020 , 14 : 1007 .
Chung HC , Ros W , Delord JP , et al . Efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase Ⅱ KEYNOTE-158 Study [J]. J Clin Oncol , 2019 , 37 ( 17 ): 1470 - 1478 .
Wiltink LM , King M , Müller F , et al . A systematic review of the impact of contemporary treatment modalities for cervical cancer on women's self-reported health-related quality of life [J]. Support Care Cancer , 2020 , 28 ( 10 ): 4627 - 4644 .
Dos SL , Castaneda L , de Aguiar SS , et al . Health-related quality of life in women with cervical cancer [J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet , 2019 , 41 ( 4 ): 242 - 248 .
0
浏览量
148
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
