华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室//中山大学肿瘤防治中心放疗科,广东 广州510060
陈雪梅,硕士,研究方向:放射治疗,E-mail:chenxuem@sysucc.org.cn
纸质出版日期:2023-01-20,
收稿日期:2022-11-10,
扫 描 看 全 文
陈雪梅,刘璐,蔡维洵等.体表光学图像引导技术联合图像引导放疗技术等中心双引导复位在乳腺癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2023,44(01):85-92.
CHEN Xue-mei,LIU Lu,CAI Wei-xun,et al.Application of SGRT Combined with IGRT Isocenter Dual-guided Resetting in IMRT for Breast Cancer[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2023,44(01):85-92.
陈雪梅,刘璐,蔡维洵等.体表光学图像引导技术联合图像引导放疗技术等中心双引导复位在乳腺癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2023,44(01):85-92. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20221208.002.
CHEN Xue-mei,LIU Lu,CAI Wei-xun,et al.Application of SGRT Combined with IGRT Isocenter Dual-guided Resetting in IMRT for Breast Cancer[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2023,44(01):85-92. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20221208.002.
目的
2
探讨体表光学图像引导技术(SGRT)联合图像引导放疗技术(IGRT)在乳腺癌术后放疗中实施等中心双引导复位的可行性,评估新的复位模式相对于传统复位模式的误差精度差异。
方法
2
回顾性分析2021年7月13日至2022年10月15日在中山大学肿瘤防治中心ELEKTA infinity加速器放疗的乳腺癌保乳术后患者,按不同复位方式分为模拟机复位组(模拟组)41例和双引导复位组(双引导组)40例。模拟组采用模拟机进行复位,首次用CBCT扫描并记录摆位误差;双引导组采用体表光学设备AlignRT引导摆位并联合CBCT进行等中心双引导复位,记录CBCT配准获取的摆位误差。分别计算并比较两种复位方式的胸壁靶区(CROI)的整体摆位误差、患侧锁骨头区域(SROI)的局部残余误差和复位时间,分析SGRT联合IGRT双引导复位的CBCT误差值分布的优点。
结果
2
模拟组和双引导组在CROI区域的整体摆位误差(X/cm、Y/cm、Z/cm、Rx°、Ry°、Rz°)中,除了Ry、Rz方向无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)外,其他方向摆位误差具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。模拟组和双引导组在患侧SROI区域的局部残余误差(X/cm、Y/cm、Z/cm、Rx°、Ry°、Rz°)中,除X、Z轴平移方向无统计学差异(
P
>
0.05)外,其他方向均具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。模拟组的复位时间为(505.36±21.96) s明显大于双引导组的(238.64±28.56) s,
t
=-24.555,
P=
0.000,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。分析双引导组的CBCT误差值分布,发现X、Y、Z轴平移误差绝对值均覆盖在0.4 cm以内,而≤0.3 cm的比例分别为95%、93%和93%,Rx、Ry、Rz旋转误差绝对值≤1.5 °的比例分别为90%、93%和90%。
结论
2
在乳腺癌调强放疗中,与传统的模拟机复位模式相比,SGRT联合IGRT进行等中心双引导复位,可以有效校正旋转角度和残余误差,提高放疗的精准度,复位时间更少,可行性高。这种精准、无标记的复位方式可在临床推广使用。
Objective
2
The objective is to investigate the possibility of isocenter dual-guided resetting of surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) combined with image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer. To assess the setup error accuracy between the new resetting mode and the traditional resetting mode.
Methods
2
Retrospective analysis was performed on breast cancer patients who underwent ELEKTA infinity accelerator radiotherapy in sun yat-sen university cancer center from July 13, 2021 to October 15, 2022. According to different reset methods, the patients were divided into a simulation group (41 cases) and a dual-guided group (40 cases). The simulation group was reset using a simulator, CBCT scans were performed and setup errors were recorded during the first treatment; The dual-guided group was guided by AlignRT and combined with CBCT for isocenter dual-guided resetting, and the setup error obtained by CBCT registration was recorded. The global setup errors of chest region of interest (CROI) , the local residual errors of supraclavicular region of interest (SROI) and the resetting time of the two reset methods were calculated and compared respectively. The advantages of the CBCT error distribution in the dual-guided resetting of SGRT combined with IGRT were analyzed.
Results
2
The median of the global setup errors (X/cm, Y/cm, Z/cm, Rx°, Ry°, Rz°) of the simulation group and the median of the dual-guided group in the CROI were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05) except the Rz and Ry directions. The local residual errors of the two groups of the SROI were calculated. The median of the errors of X/cm, Y/cm, Z/cm, Rx°, Ry°, Rz° were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05) except the X and Y axis. The resetting time of the simulation group was significantly longer than that of the dual-guided group (238.64±28.56) s,
t
=-24.555,
P=
0.000, and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). The CBCT error distribution of the dual-guide group was analyzed, and it was found that the absolute values of translation errors of X, Y and Z axis were all within 0.4 cm, while the proportions of ≤ 0.3 cm were 95%, 93% and 93%, respectively. The proportions of rotation errors of Rx, Ry and Rz ≤ 1.5 ° were 90%, 93% and 90%, respectively.
Conclusion
2
In postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer, SGRT combined with IGRT for isocenter dual-guided resetting can effectively correct the rotational setup errors and residual errors, and improve the accuracy of radiotherapy with less resetting time and high feasibility, which compared with the traditional simulator resetting mode. This precise, unmarked resetting method can be widely used in clinical practice.
乳腺癌锥形束CT体表光学图像引导技术双引导复位无标记残余误差
breast cancercone beam CTsurface-guided radiation therapydual-guided resettingunmarked, residual error
张春灵,王宁,邴雪,等. MRI影像组学在乳腺癌诊疗中的应用进展[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学,2022,31(5):377-381.
Zhang CL, Wang N, Bing X, et al. The application of MRI imageomics in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer[J]. Diagn Imaging & Interv Radiol, 2022, 31(5): 377-381.
de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson ALV. Survival after breast conservation vs mastectomy adjusted for comorbidity and socioeconomic status: a Swedish national 6-year follow-up of 48986 women[J]. JAMA Surg. 2021, 156(7): 628-637.
Franco P, Arcadipane F, Ragona R,et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the combined modality treatment of anal cancer patients[J]. Br J Radiol, 2016; 89(1060): 20150832.
陈雪梅,黄晓彤,蔡维洵,等.锥形束CT离线校正在乳腺癌放疗摆位中的应用[J]. 广东医学,2022,43(7):811-816.
Chen XM, Huang XT, Cai WX, et al. Application of off-line correction of cone-beam CT in breast cancer radiotherapy setting[J]. Guangdong Med J, 2022, 43(7): 811-816.
Jiang P, Zhang X, Wei S, et al. Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2020, 21(4): 22-30.
Bruce J, Mazuquin B, Mistry P, et al. Exercise to prevent shoulder problems after breast cancer surgery: the PROSPER RCT[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2022, 26(15): 1-124.
Jimenez RB, Batin E, Giantsoudi D, et al. Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: a feasibility study[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2019, 20(4): 45-50.
Rigley J, Robertson P, Scattergood L. Radiotherapy without tattoos: could this work?[J]. Radiography (Lond), 2020, 26(4): 288-293.
Javor J, Cashell A, Rosewall T, et al. Eliminating tattoos for short course palliative radiation therapy: set-up error, satisfaction and cost[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci, 2022, 53(2 Suppl): S56-S62.
Acosta AM, Mikalsen SG, Hellenbust TP. Positioning errors in free breathing and DIBH breast cancer radiotherapy: SGRT vs skin markers[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2019, 133: S1100. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(19)32428-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(19)32428-4.
Laaksomaa M, Sarudis S, Rossi M, et al. AlignRT® and Catalyst™ in whole-breast radiotherapy with DIBH: is IGRT still needed?[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2019, 20(3): 97-104.
高吉福,汪智勇.胸腹部肿瘤调强放疗首次摆位误差的分析[J]. 医疗装备,2016(6):41-42.
Gao JF, Wang ZY. Analysis of initial positioning error in intensity modulated radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumors[J]. Med Equip, 2016(6): 41-42.
于松茂,杨敬贤,康加阜,等.不同部位肿瘤患者模拟机复位误差的对比分析[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2): 141-144.
Yu SM, Yang JX, Kang JF, et al. Comparison of reset errors in simulator for patients with tumors in different locations[J]. Chin J of Med Phys, 2018, 35(2): 141-144.
张爱华,张军,胡健,等.CT用于腹部放射治疗前等中心位置验证的临床应用[J]. 中国医学装备,2020,17(3):53-56.
Zhang AH, Zhang J, Hu J, et al. Clinical application of CT in the verification of isocenter position pre abdominal radiotherapy[J]. Chi Med Equip, 2020, 17(3): 53-56.
Topolnjak R, Sonke JJ, Nijkamp J, et al. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 78(4): 1235-43.
Dhar D, Mallik S, Goswami J. Validation of a simple technique for accurate treatment delivery for bilateral breast irradiation using the electronic portal imaging device[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2022, 18(4): 1159-1161.
Kügele M, Mannerberg A, Nørring Bekke S, et al. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves breast cancer patient setup accuracy[J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2019, 20(9): 61-68.
Liu H, Andrews M, Markovich A, et al. Dosimetric effect of uncorrected rotations in lung SBRT with stereotactic imaging guidance[J]. Phys Med, 2017, 42: 197-202.
Batumalai V, Holloway L, Delaney GP. A review of setup error in supine breast radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Med Dosim, 2016, 41(3): 225-229.
Zhou J, Li S, Ye C, et al. Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy[J]. J Radiat Res, 2020, 61(3): 457-463.
Kapanen M, Laaksomaa M, Skyttä T, et al. Residual position errors of lymph node surrogates in breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy: comparison of two arm fixation devices and the effect of arm position correction[J]. Med Dosim, 2016, 41(1): 47-52.
Shen K, Xiong J, Wang Z, et al. Design of a new breast vacuum bag to reduce the global and local setup errors and to reduce PTV margin in post-mastectomy radiation therapy[J]. J Radiat Res, 2020, 61(6): 985-992.
陈雪梅,黄晓彤,王亚娟,等.体表光学设备AlignRT在乳腺癌根治术后调强放疗引 导摆位中的应用[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2022,29(19):1408-1414.
Chen XM, Huang XT, Wang YJ, et al. AlignRT SGRT system positioning accuracy on breast mastectomy IMRT radiotherapy patients[J]. Chin J of Cancer Prev and Treat, 2022, 29(19): 1408-1414.
Naidoo W, Leech M. Feasibility of surface guided radiotherapy for patient positioning in breast radiotherapy versus conventional tattoo-based setups- a systematic review[J]. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol, 2022, 22: 39-49.
Sauer TO, Ott OJ, Lahmer G, et al. Prerequisites for the clinical implementation of amarkerless SGRT-only workflow for the treatment of breast cancer patients[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2022:1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01966-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01966-7.
Landeg SJ, Kirby AM, Lee SF, et al. A randomized control trial evaluating fluorescent ink versus dark ink tattoos for breast radiotherapy[J]. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89(1068): 20160288, doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160288http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160288.
Sueyoshi M, Olch AJ, Liu KX, et al. Eliminating daily shifts, tattoos, and skin marks: streamlining isocenter localization with treatment plan embedded couch values for external beam radiation therapy[J]. Pract Radiat Oncol, 2019, 9(1): e110-e117.
Zhang J, Chen Y, Chen Y, et al. A noninvasive body setup method for radiotherapy by using a multimodal image fusion technique[J]. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 16(6): 1187-1193.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构