中山大学附属第一医院妇产科,广东广州 510080
祝彩霞,第一作者,研究方向:母胎医学,E-mail: zhucx3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2023-11-20,
收稿日期:2023-05-09,
扫 描 看 全 文
祝彩霞,蔡诗琴,黄晓晴等.妊娠期附件扭转手术治疗病例临床特点及妊娠结局分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2023,44(06):1053-1059.
ZHU Cai-xia,CAI Shi-qin,HUANG Xiao-qing,et al.Clinical Characteristics and Obstetric Outcomes of Pregnant Women Who Underwent Surgery for Adnexal Torsion[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2023,44(06):1053-1059.
祝彩霞,蔡诗琴,黄晓晴等.妊娠期附件扭转手术治疗病例临床特点及妊娠结局分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2023,44(06):1053-1059. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2023.0621.
ZHU Cai-xia,CAI Shi-qin,HUANG Xiao-qing,et al.Clinical Characteristics and Obstetric Outcomes of Pregnant Women Who Underwent Surgery for Adnexal Torsion[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2023,44(06):1053-1059. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2023.0621.
目的
2
探讨手术治疗的不同孕周的妊娠期附件扭转的临床特点和妊娠结局。
方法
2
回顾性分析2013年3月至2023年3月在中山大学附属第一医院住院手术治疗并分娩的39例妊娠期附件扭转患者的临床资料,其中妊娠早期(
<
14周)18例,妊娠中期(14~27
+6
周)11例,和妊娠晚期(≥28周)10例,比较3组的临床特点、诊治和妊娠结局的差异。
结果
2
妊娠早期组辅助生殖技术受孕的比例高于妊娠中、晚期组(
P
=0.026)。3组患者腹痛、恶心、呕吐、发热等临床表现差异无统计学意义,但妊娠中、晚期组患者白细胞升高更常见。妊娠早、中、晚期发生扭转的直径
<
5 cm的附件包块分别占0.0%、18.2%和10.0%,具有统计学差异(
P
=0.014)。但扭转的附件位置、圈数、病理性质均差异无统计学意义。超声对于妊娠早期附件扭转的诊出率显著高于妊娠中、晚期组(77.8%,36.4%, 20.0%;
P
=0.008)。妊娠早期组选用腹腔镜手术比例高于妊娠中、晚期组(55.6% , 27.3%, 0.0%;
P
=0.008)。3患者的分娩孕周、分娩方式、新生儿性别、新生儿出生体质量和随访情况均差异无统计学意义,但妊娠晚期组早产风险高于妊娠早、中期组(
P
=0.050)。
结论
2
辅助生殖技术受孕更常见于妊娠早期组附件扭转患者,当同时出现腹痛、白细胞升高且无感染征象时,需要警惕附件扭转,超声在妊娠早期附件扭转的诊断价值高,妊娠期附件扭转腹腔镜手术安全,母儿预后良好。
Objective
2
To explore the clinical characteristics and obstetric outcomes of pregnant women who underwent surgery for adnexal torsion at different gestational weeks.
Methods
2
A retrospective study was done on 39 women who underwent surgery for adnexal torsion during pregnancy in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between March 2013 and March 2023, with 18 cases in 1
st
trimester (
<
14 weeks), 11 in 2
nd
trimester (14-27
+6
weeks) and 10 in 3
rd
trimester (≥28 weeks). The clinical characteristics, treatment and obstetric outcomes were compared among the three groups.
Results
2
The 1
st
trimester group had higher proportion of assisted reproductive technology (ART) use than the 2
nd
and 3
rd
trimester groups (
P
=0.026). There was no significant difference in the clinical manifestations, including abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and fever among the three groups, while elevated white blood cells (WBC) counts was more commonly seen in the 2
nd
and 3
rd
trimester groups. Adnexal masses
<
5 cm in diameter occurred in 0, 18.2%, and 10.0% of cases in 1
st
, 2
nd
and 3
rd
trimester groups respectively (
P
=0.014). No statistical significance was found in the location of twisted adnexa, number of circles or pathological nature. The 1
st
trimester group had a higher sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion compared with the 2
nd
and 3
rd
trimester groups (77.8%, 36.4%, 20.0%;
P
=0.008). More laparoscopic surgery were performed in the 1
st
trimester group than the other two groups (55.6% , 27.3%, 0.0%;
P
=0.008). There was no significant difference in gestational week of delivery, delivery mode, newborn gender, neonatal birth weight and follow-up of newborns among the three groups. The 3
rd
trimester group showed a higher risk of preterm delivery (
P
=0.050).
Conclusions
2
During the 1
st
trimester of pregnancy, adnexal torsion is more common in patients using ART and ultrasound plays a crucial role in the diagnosis. During the 2
nd
and 3
rd
trimester, adnexal torsion should be suspected in patients with abdominal pain and elevated WBC but no aspetic inflammation. Laparoscopic surgery is safe for adnexal torsion during pregnancy and can achieve a favorable maternal and neonatal outcome.
附件扭转孕周临床特点妊娠结局腹痛白细胞升高
adnexal torsiongestational weekclinical characteristicsobstetric outcomesabdominal painelevated WBC
Chang-Patel EJ, Palacios-Helgeson LK, Gould CH. Adnexal torsion: a review of diagnosis and management strategies[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 34(4): 196-203.
Seo SK, Lee JB, Lee I, et al. Clinical and pathological comparisons of adnexal torsion between pregnant and non-pregnant women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(9): 1899-1905.
Wang YX, Deng S. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of adnexal torsion in pregnant women: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020, 20(1): 483.
Spitzer D, Wirleitner B, Steiner H, et al. Adnexal torsion in pregnancy after assisted reproduction-case study and review of the literature[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2012, 72(8): 716-720.
Didar H, Najafiarab H, Keyvanfar A, et al. Adnexal torsion in pregnancy: a systematic review of case reports and case series[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2023, 65: 43-52.
Guo XY, Shao H, Yuan PB, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and outcome of adnexal torsion at different gestational weeks during pregnancy[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2021, 101(27): 2159-2163.
Khanzadeh S, Tahernia H, Hernandez J, et al. Predictive role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in adnexal torsion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2022, 2022: 9680591.
Koo YJ, Kim TJ, Lee JE, et al. Risk of torsion and malignancy by adnexal mass size in pregnant women[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2011, 90(4): 358-361.
Daykan Y, Bogin R, Sharvit M, et al. Ovarian size as a risk factor for recurrent adnexal torsion: Smaller is not better[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46(5): 745-751.
Cathcart AM, Nezhat FR, Emerson J, et al. Adnexal masses during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022.
Wozniak S, Wozniak A, Kozlowska M, et al. Ultrasonographic signs of acute ovarian torsion[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2022.
Garde I, Paredes C, Ventura L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound signs for detecting adnexal torsion: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 61(3): 310-324.
Bardin R, Perl N, Mashiach R, et al. Prediction of adnexal torsion by ultrasound in women with acute abdominal pain[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2020, 41(6): 688-694.
Feng JL, Zheng J, Lei T, et al. Comparison of ovarian torsion between pregnant and non-pregnant women at reproductive ages: sonographic and pathological findings[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020, 10(1): 137-147.
Bai W, Xu X, Xie H, et al. Adnexal torsion in the third trimester of pregnancy: a case report and diagnostic value of MR imaging[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2020, 20(1): 19.
Lee JH, Roh HJ, Ahn JW, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for maternal acute adnexal torsion during pregnancy: single-institution clinical performance review[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(7): 2209.
Ye P, Zhao N, Shu J, et al. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(3): 625-634.
Weiner E, Mizrachi Y, Keidar R, et al. Laparoscopic surgery performed in advanced pregnancy compared to early pregnancy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 292(5): 1063-1068.
Meyer R, Meller N, Komem DA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopy for suspected adnexal torsion during pregnancy[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(25): 6396-6402.
Elci E. Laparoscopic management of a torsioned adnexal mass in the third trimester of pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2022, 44(4): 335-336.
Pearl JP, Price RR, Tonkin AE, et al. SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(10): 3767-3782.
Daykan Y, Bogin R, Sharvit M, et al. Adnexal Torsion during pregnancy: outcomes after surgical intervention-a retrospective case-control study[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019, 26(1): 117-121.
Ekici H, Okmen F, Imamoglu M, et al. Perioperative outcomes in pregnant women who underwent surgery for adnexal torsion[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2022, 44(4): 336-342.
Dvash S, Pekar M, Melcer Y, et al. Adnexal torsion in pregnancy managed by laparoscopy is associated with favorable obstetric outcomes[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020, 27(6): 1295-1299.
0
浏览量
15
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构