解剖型锁定钛板与髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的疗效比较

马梦君; 陈彦博; 曾钢; 陈宸; 宋卫东; 刘文宙

doi:10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240004.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

解剖型锁定钛板与髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的疗效比较

临床研究 | 更新时间：2024-02-22

- 解剖型锁定钛板与髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的疗效比较
- Comparison of Anatomic Locking Titanium Plate and Intramedullary Nail in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures
- 中山大学学报（医学科学版） 2024年45卷第1期页码：108-113
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中山大学附属第八医院骨外科，广东深圳 518033
  2.中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院骨外科，广东广州 510000
- 作者简介：
  
  马梦君，第一作者，研究方向：骨关节疾病的基础研究与临床转化，E-mail：mamj8@mail.sysu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金(82102530);广东省自然科学基金(2022A1515012334)
- DOI：10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240004.016
  中图分类号： R687.3
- 纸质出版日期：2024-01-20，
  
  收稿日期：2023-07-15，
  
  录用日期：2023-12-01
扫描看全文
马梦君,陈彦博,曾钢等.解剖型锁定钛板与髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].中山大学学报（医学科学版）,2024,45(01):108-113.

MA Mengjun,CHEN Yanbo,ZENG Gang,et al.Comparison of Anatomic Locking Titanium Plate and Intramedullary Nail in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(01):108-113.
马梦君,陈彦博,曾钢等.解剖型锁定钛板与髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].中山大学学报（医学科学版）,2024,45(01):108-113. DOI： 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240004.016.

MA Mengjun,CHEN Yanbo,ZENG Gang,et al.Comparison of Anatomic Locking Titanium Plate and Intramedullary Nail in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(01):108-113. DOI： 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240004.016.

摘要

目的

对比应用解剖型锁定钛板与髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的临床疗效与并发症情况。

方法

自2019年9月至2021年9月，于中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院诊断为胫骨远端AO-A型骨折的手术患者纳入本研究，共32例。其中15例采用钛板螺钉治疗，17例采用髓内钉治疗。比较两组一般手术指标、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症发生情况、手术前后VAS评分及术后踝关节功能。

结果

患者均获得随访，随访时间10～20个月，平均12个月。髓内钉组手术时间、术中透视次数均长于钛板螺钉组，但术前等待时间、住院天数少于钛板螺钉组，统计学差异显著（

＜0.05）；两组骨折愈合时间相比，差异无统计学意义（

＞0.05）；术后6周，两组VAS评分均低于术前，统计学差异显著（

＜0.05）；髓内钉组与钛板螺钉组相比，手术前后VAS评分差异无统计学意义（

＞0.05）；术后6月AOFAS评分、术后1年踝关节活动度、并发症发生率髓内钉组优于钛板螺钉组，统计学差异显著（

＜0.05）；术后1年AOFAS评分两组差异无统计学意义（

＞0.05）。

结论

钛板螺钉与髓内钉均是治疗胫骨远端AO-A型骨折的有效术式，远期临床疗效无明显差异。髓内钉的软组织并发症较少，对踝关节活动度影响更小，康复更快，安全性更高，而钛板螺钉发生术后软组织感染的概率较大。我们建议在临床工作中，应该做好患者的术前评估，在把握适应症的前提下，髓内钉并发症更少，有一定优势。

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the clinical efficacy and complications of anatomic locking titanium plate （hereinafter referred to as “titanium plate screw”） and intramedullary nail in the treatment of distal tibial fractures.

Methods

From September 2019 to September 2021， 32 patients diagnosed with AO-A fracture of distal tibia at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were included in this study. Of these， 15 cases were treated with titanium plate screws and 17 cases were treated with intramedullary nails. General surgical indexes， fracture healing time and postoperative operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

All patients were followed up for 10 to 20 months， with an average of 12 months. The operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times of intramedullary nail group were longer than those of titanium plate screw group， but the preoperative waiting time and hospitalization days was less or were fewer than those of titanium plate screw group， the difference was statistically significant （

0.05）. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups （

0.05）. At 6 weeks after operation， VAS scores in both groups were lower than those before operation， with statistically significant difference （

0.05）. There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the intramedullary nail group and the titanium plate screw group （

0.05）. AOFAS scores 6 months after surgery， ankle joint motion and complication rate 1 year after surgery in intramedullary screw group were better than those in titanium plate screw group， and the differences were statistically significant （

0.05）. There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups at 1 year after operation （

0.05）.

Conclusion

Titanium plate screw and intramedullary nail are both effective methods for the treatment of distal tibial AO-A fracture， and there is no significant difference in long-term clinical efficacy. Intramedullary nail has fewer soft tissue complications， less impact on ankle motion， faster recovery and higher safety， while titanium plate screw has a higher probability of postoperative soft tissue infection. We suggest that in clinical work， preoperative evaluation of patients should be done well. Under the premise of grasping the indications， intramedullary nail has fewer complications and certain advantages.

关键词

胫骨远端骨折解剖型锁定钛板髓内钉治疗疗效

Keywords

distal tibial fracturesanatomical locking titanium plateintramedullary nailtreatmentefficacy

references

Cannada LK， Anglen JO， Archdeacon MT， JrHerscovici D， Ostrum RF. Avoiding complications in the care of fractures of the tibia［J］. Instr Course Lect， 2009， 58： 27–36.

Cheng W， Li Y， Manyi W. Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture-minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation［J］. Int Orthop， 2011， 35： 737–742.

Casstevens C， Le T， Archdeacon MT， Wyrick JD. Management of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia： intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation［J］. Am Acad Orthop Surg， 2012， 20： 675–783.

Zelle BA， Bhandari M， Espiritu M， Koval KJ， Zlowodzki M. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement： a systematic review of 1125 fractures［J］. Orthop Trauma， 2006， 20： 76–79.

Barcak E， Collinge CA. Metaphyseal distal tibia fractures： a cohort， singlesurgeon study comparing outcomes of patients treated with minimally invasive plating versus intramedullary nailing［J］. J Orthop Trauma， 2016， 30： e169–174.

Vallier HA， Cureton BA， Patterson BM. Randomized， prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures［J］. J Orthop Trauma， 2011， 25： 736–741.

郭朋，欧双权，张东，等. 应用弹性髓内钉与钢板治疗儿童胫骨干骨折的临床研究［J］. 重庆医科大学学报， 2022， 47（4）： 469-472.

Guo P， Ou SQ， Zhang D， et al. Clinical comparison of elastic intramedullary nail and steel plate in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture in children［J］. J Chongqing Med Univ， 2022， 47（4）： 469-472.

Seyhan M， Unay K， Sener N. Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of distal extra-articular tibial fractures： a retrospective study［J］. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol， 2013， 23： 595–601.

蔡振宇，杨伟，施忠民. 胫骨远端骨折的治疗现状［J］. 中国临床医学， 2014， 21（3）： 374-376.

Cai ZY， Yang W， Shi ZM. Treatment of distal tibial fracture ［J］. Chin J Clin Med， 2014， 21（3）： 374-376.

袁景，关晓龙，甄平. 解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折［J］. 临床骨科杂志， 2018， 21（6）： 725 -727

Yuan J， Guan XL， Zhen P. Treatment of comminuted fracture of distal tibia with anatomic locking plate fixation ［J］. J Clin Orthopaed， 2018， 21（6）： 725-727.

吕鹏飞，裴征，刘家帮，等. 内侧微创经皮锁定钢板和交锁髓内针治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折的疗效比较［J］. 中国骨与关节杂志， 2021， 10（8）： 614-617.

Lv PF， Pei Z， Liu JB， et al. Comparison of the efficacy of minimally invasive medial percutaneous locking plate and interlocking intramedullary needle in the treatment of distal tibial extrarticular fractures ［J］. Chin J Bone Joint， 2021， 10（8）： 614-617.

Vallier HA， Cureton BA， Patterson BM. Factors influencing functional outcomes after distal tibia shaft fractures［J］. J Orthop Trauma， 2012， 26： 178–183.

姚昱，章筛林. 解剖型锁定钢板经皮微创内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折［J］. 临床骨科杂志， 2017， 20（2）： 253.

Yao Y， Zhang SL. Treatment of distal tibial fracture with anatomic locking plate with minimally invasive internal fixation［J］. J Clin Orthopaed， 2017， 20（2）： 253.

马腾，路遥，李忠，等. 闭合复位胫骨髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折疗效观察［J］. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志， 2016， 31（10）： 1102 -1103.

Ma T， Lu Y， Li Z， et al. Therapeutic effect of closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation on distal tibial fracture ［J］. Chin J Bone Joint Injury， 2016， 31（10）： 1102-1103.

陈建. 微创经皮钢板接骨技术+LCP与闭合复位静态交锁髓内钉在胫骨远端骨折中的应用效果比较［J］. 中国现代医生， 2021， 59（8）： 72-75.

Chen J. Comparison of application effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteoplasty plus LCP and closed reduction static interlocking intramedullary nail in distal tibial fractures ［J］. Chin Modern Physic， 2021， 59（8）： 72-75.

ChunDong-Il， MinTae-Hong， Myeong KangEun. Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes in patients treated with standard plating versus intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fracture［J］. Orthopaedic Surgery 2022， 14： 536-542.

Beytemur O， Baris A， Albay C， et al. Comparison of intramedullary nailing and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of simple intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia （AO-OTA type 43 C1-C2）［J］. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc， 2017， 51（1）： 12-16.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

腰部肌群稳定性康复训练结合肌内效贴扎技术在腰椎间盘突出症康复治疗中的应用

孕产妇感染新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株的研究现状

中国人UGT1A1*28的基因多态性以及与伊立替康毒性和疗效的关系