1.中山大学附属第三医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科,广东 广州 510630
2.中山大学附属第三医院麻醉科,广东 广州 510630
3.中山大学附属第三医院眩晕耳鸣诊疗中心,广东 广州 510630
4.广州新华学院听力与言语科学系, 广东 广州 510520
黎志成,第一作者,研究方向:耳鸣的心理及生理机制
纸质出版日期:2024-03-20,
收稿日期:2023-10-30,
录用日期:2024-02-18
扫 描 看 全 文
黎志成,程楠,邢纪斌等.星状神经节阻滞用于慢性主观性耳鸣困扰的辅助干预效果及预测指标初析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2024,45(02):276-282.
LI Zhicheng,CHENG Nan,XING Jibin,et al.Stellate Ganglion Block as an Adjunctive Intervention for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus: Efficacy and Predictive Indicators[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(02):276-282.
黎志成,程楠,邢纪斌等.星状神经节阻滞用于慢性主观性耳鸣困扰的辅助干预效果及预测指标初析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2024,45(02):276-282. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240304.001.
LI Zhicheng,CHENG Nan,XING Jibin,et al.Stellate Ganglion Block as an Adjunctive Intervention for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus: Efficacy and Predictive Indicators[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(02):276-282. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240304.001.
目的
2
探讨星状神经节阻滞(SGB)用于慢性主观性耳鸣困扰的辅助干预效果,及相应的预测指标,为SGB应用于耳鸣的临床干预累积经验。
方法
2
回顾因其他干预方案效果不理想而在中山大学附属第三医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科接受SGB干预的慢性主观性耳鸣患者资料。SGB干预前进行耳鸣残疾量表(THI)评估、纯音听阈测试、耳鸣响度评估,部分患者接受了睡眠质量(PSQI)评估。SGB干预后复测THI,以评价SGB的干预效果。随后,通过相关分析及线性回归方程探寻预测SGB干预效果的潜在指标。数据的统计分析采用SPSS 24.0进行,
P
<
0.05表示存在统计学意义。
结果
2
至2023年04月,共有107名慢性主观性耳鸣患者接受了SGB干预,其中男性患者67名,女性患者40名,平均(45.32±11.40)周岁,耳鸣持续(20.32±24.64)月[16(12~20)]。有7名患者因个人原因中途退组,退组率6.54%,干预依从性良好。所有患者均未出现穿刺部位感染、血肿、神经损伤、局麻药中毒等不良反应,安全性良好。SGB干预后,有77名患者的THI得分下降至36分及以下,剩余的患者中有12名的THI得分下降幅度达到10分及以上,有效率为89%;配对样本
t
检验显示,SGB干预前后的THI得分有显著的统计学差异(
t
= 15.575,
P
<
0.001),干预效果良好。皮尔逊相关分析显示,干预前的THI得分和耳鸣主观响度与THI的改善水平呈显著的正相关关系(
P
<
0.05);进一步的逐步线性回归分析发现,“干预前THI得分”具有显著的统计学意义(
P
<
0.001),回归系数为0.308,预测了THI改善水平的17.4%。
结论
2
SGB干预慢性主观性耳鸣困扰的短期效果良好、安全性高,可用于常规干预方案不理想时(尤其是THI得分较高患者)的补充方案,但后续研究需要明确长期疗效及内在机制,为SGB应用于主观性耳鸣的干预奠定更为扎实的理论基础。
Objective
2
To explore the efficacy and predictive indicators of stellate ganglion block (SGB) as an adjunctive intervention for chronic subjective tinnitus and accumulate experience for the application of SGB in the clinical treatment of tinnitus.
Methods
2
A retrospective review was conducted on the data of chronic subjective tinnitus patients who received SGB intervention, with unsatisfactory outcomes otherwise. Pure tone audiometry (PTA), tinnitus loudness evaluation and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) were used. The tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) scores were compared before and after SGB intervention. Correlation analysis and linear regression equations were employed to identify the potential indicators predicting the effectiveness of SGB intervention. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 24.0 software.
Results
2
By April 2023, a total of 107 patients with chronic subjective tinnitus had undergone SGB intervention, including 67 male and 40 female, with a mean age of (45.32±11.40) years old and an average tinnitus history of (20.32±24.64) months [16 (12~20)]. Only 7 patients (6.54%) quitted the intervention for personal reasons, which demonstrated good compliance with the intervention. No patients experienced adverse reactions such as infection at the injection site, hematoma, nerve injury, local anesthetic intoxication and so on, which revealed good safety. After SGB intervention, THI scores decreased to below 36 points in 77 patients and decrease by 10 points or more in 12 of the remaining patients, with a total effective rate of 89%. A paired sample t-test showed a significant difference in THI scores before and after SGB intervention (
t
=15.575,
P
<
0.001), indicating good improvement. Pearson correlation analysis suggested that pre-intervention THI scores and subjective tinnitus loudness were significantly positively correlated with the improvement level of THI scores (
P
<
0.05). Further stepwise linear regression analysis found that "pre-intervention THI scores" had statistical significance (
P
<
0.001), with a regression coefficient of 0.308, predicting a 17.4% improvement level in THI scores.
Conclusions
2
Due to its good and safe short-term effects, SGB intervention can be used as a supplementary option for chronic subjective tinnitus when other interventions are not ideal, especially for patients with higher THI scores. However, further research is needed to clarify the long-term efficacy and underlying mechanisms, in order to establish a more solid theoretical basis for SGB intervention in the treatment of subjective tinnitus.
慢性主观性耳鸣星状神经节阻滞耳鸣困扰干预效果预测指标
chronic subjective tinnitusstellate ganglion block (SGB)tinnitus distressintervention effectpredictive indicators
Jarach C, Lugo A, Scala M, et al. Global prevalence and incidence of tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2022, 79(9): 888-900.
Pattyn T, Van Den Eede F, Vanneste S, et al. Tinnitus and anxiety disorders: a review[J]. Hear Res, 2016, 333: 255-265.
Langguth B, Landgrebe M, Kleinjung T, et al. Tinnitus and depression[J]. World J Biol Psychiatry, 2011, 12: 489-500.
Marks E, Hallsworth C, Vogt F, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) as a treatment for tinnitus-related insomnia: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Cogn Behav Ther, 2023, 52(2): 91-109.
Cheng YF, Xirasagar S, Kuo NW, et al. Tinnitus and risk of attempted suicide: a one year follow-up study[J]. J Affect Disord, 2023, 322: 141-145.
严敏, 刘小立, 王林, 等. 星状神经节阻滞疗法中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华疼痛学杂志, 2022, 18(3): 293-301.
Yan M, Liu XL, Wang L, et al. Expert consensus for stellate ganglion block therapy in China(2022)[J]. Chin J Painol, 2022, 18(3): 293-301.
吴杰贤, 容英旋, 黄绮娟, 等. 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞联合电针治疗特发性面神经麻痹的临床观察[J]. 广东医学, 2023, 44(5): 636-639
Wu JX, Rong YX, Huang QJ, et al. Clinical observation of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block combined with electroacupuncture for idiopathic facial paralysis[J]. Guangdong Med J, 2023, 44(5): 636-639.
Rae Olmsted KL, Bartoszek M, Mulvaney S, et al. Effect of stellate ganglion block treatment on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2020, 77(2): 130-138.
Peker S, Sirin A. Parallels between phantom pain and tinnitus[J]. Med Hypotheses, 2016, 91: 95-97.
Cima RFF, Mazurek B, Haider H, et al. A multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment[J]. HNO, 2019, 67(Suppl 1): 10-42.
刘贤臣, 唐茂芹, 胡蕾, 等. 匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度和效度研究[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 1996(2): 103-107.
Liu XC, Tang MQ, Hu L, et al. Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index[J]. Chin J Psychiatry, 1996(2): 103-107.
路桃影, 李艳, 夏萍, 等. 匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度及效度分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2014(3): 260-263.
Lu YT, Li Y, Xia P, et al. Analysis on reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index[J]. Chongqing Med J, 2014(3): 260-263.
Kam AC, Cheung AP, Chan PY, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) tinnitus handicap inventory[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2009, 34(4): 309-315.
Meng Z, Zheng Y, Liu S, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese (mandarin) tinnitus handicap inventory[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2012, 5(1): 10-16.
石秋兰, 卜行宽, 王俊国, 等. 耳鸣致残量表中文版的研译与临床应用[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 27(5): 476-479.
Shi QL, Bu XK, Wang JG, et al. Translation and application of tinnitus handicap inventory in Chinese version[J]. J Nanjing Med Univ (Natural Sci), 2007, 27(5): 476-479.
刘斌, 陈红怡, 吴忠英, 等. 创伤后应激障碍物理治疗研究进展[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2023, 49(9): 570-576.
Liu B, Chen HY, Wu ZY, et al. Progress in physical therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2023, 49(9): 570-576.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构