浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中山大学附属第一医院儿科,广东 广州 510080
2.中山大学中山医学院,广东 广州 510080
YU Mu-xue; E-mail: yumuxue@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Published:20 November 2023,
Received:20 March 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
李姝,余慕雪,冯嘉丽等.双胎绒毛膜性、出生胎龄、出生体质量不一致程度与新生儿结局分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2023,44(06):1030-1037.
LI Shu,YU Mu-xue,FENG Jia-li,et al.Effect of Chorionicity, Gestational Age at Birth and Birth Weight Discordance on Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2023,44(06):1030-1037.
李姝,余慕雪,冯嘉丽等.双胎绒毛膜性、出生胎龄、出生体质量不一致程度与新生儿结局分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2023,44(06):1030-1037. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2023.0618.
LI Shu,YU Mu-xue,FENG Jia-li,et al.Effect of Chorionicity, Gestational Age at Birth and Birth Weight Discordance on Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2023,44(06):1030-1037. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2023.0618.
目的
2
探讨双胎妊娠的单绒毛膜双羊膜囊(MCDA)和双绒毛膜双羊膜囊(DCDA)不同绒毛膜性、出生胎龄和出生体质量不一致程度与活产双胎新生儿结局的关系。
方法
2
回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年12月在中山大学附属第一医院住院分娩的MCDA和DCDA活产双胎新生儿临床资料,共纳入1 504例。MCDA组和DCDA组分别为386例和1 118例。采用
t
检验、秩和检验、
χ
2
检验/Fish确切概率法比较两组新生儿结局;logistic回归分析绒毛膜性、出生胎龄、出生体质量不一致程度和性别对双胎新生儿结局的影响。出生体质量不一致程度≥25%双胎新生儿168例,MCDA组和DCDA组分别为96例和72例,logistic 回归分析绒毛膜性、出生胎龄、双胎出生体质量低或高(小胎儿或大胎儿)和性别对新生儿结局的影响。
结果
2
在1 504例活产双胎新生儿中MCDA组出生胎龄低于DCDA组(
P
= 0.000)、MCDA组出生体质量不一致程度高于DCDA组(
P
= 0.001);MCDA组出生窒息、呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)和败血症的发生率高于DCDA组(
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000);出生胎龄低分别是双胎新生儿出生窒息、RDS、BPD、败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)≥Ⅱ期、急性肾损伤(AKI)、视网膜病变(ROP)发生以及死亡的独立危险因素(
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.011,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000),出生体质量不一致程度高分别是双胎新生儿出生窒息、RDS、BPD、败血症和ROP发生的独立危险因素(
P
= 0.045,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.004,
P
= 0.017);绒毛膜性不是双胎新生儿各种疾病发生和死亡的独立危险因素(
P
值均
>
0.05)。在168例出生体质量不一致程度≥25%双胎新生儿中,出生胎龄低分别是其出生窒息、RDS、BPD、败血症和ROP发生的独立危险因素(
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000),双胎的小胎儿分别是出生窒息和BPD发生的独立危险因素(
P
= 0.013,
P
= 0.001);绒毛膜性不是新生儿疾病发生的独立危险因素(
P
值均
>
0.05)。
结论
2
绒毛膜性不是双胎新生儿不良结局发生的独立危险因素,出生胎龄低和出生体质量不一致程度高是双胎新生儿不良结局的独立危险因素;出生体质量不一致程度≥25%双胎的小胎儿新生儿结局更差。
Objective
2
To investigate the effect of chorionicity, gestational age at birth and birth weight discordance on neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.
Methods
2
We conducted a population-based retrospective study of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies and dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies who were admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from January 2015 to December 2020. A total of 1504 live-born twins were included, with 386 cases in MCDA group and 1118 cases in DCDA groups, respectively. The comparison of neonatal outcomes between MCDA and DCDA twins was performed using
t
-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effects of chorionicity, gestational age at birth, birth weight discordance and sex on neonatal outcomes. There were 168 live-born twins affected by inter-twin birth weight discordance≥25%, with 96 cases in MCDA group and 72 cases in DCDA groups, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effects of chorionicity, gestational age at birth, birth weight light or heavy (small twin or large twin) of the twin and sex on neonatal outcomes.
Results
2
Among the 1 504 newborns, gestational age at birth was lower in MCDA group compared with DCDA group (
P
= 0.000), and the degree of birth weight discordance was higher in MCDA group than that of the DCDA group (
P
= 0.001). Birth asphyxia, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and sepsis were more frequency in MCDA group compared with DCDA group (
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000). Low gestational age at birth was an independent risk factor for birth asphyxia, RDS, BPD, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)≥stageⅡ, acute kidney injury (AKI), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and neonatal death respectively (
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.011,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000). High degree of birth weight discordance was an independent risk factor for birth asphyxia, RDS, BPD, sepsis and ROP respectively (
P
= 0.045,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.004,
P
= 0.017 ). Chorionicity was not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity and death (
P
>
0.05). Among the 168 twins with birth weight discordance ≥25%, low gestational age at birth was an independent risk factor for birth asphyxia, RDS, BPD, sepsis and ROP, respectively (
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000,
P
= 0.000); small twin was an independent risk factor for birth asphyxia and BPD, respectively (
P
= 0.013,
P
= 0.001); chorionicity was not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Chorionicity was not an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome in twin births. Low gestational age at birth and high degree of birth weight discordance were independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome in twin births. Small twins had increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome in twins with birth weight discordance ≥25%.
双胎绒毛膜性出生胎龄出生体质量不一致新生儿结局
twinchorionicitiygestational age at birthbirth weight discordanceneonatal outcomes
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 97(4): 825-834.
Antonakopoulos N, Pateisky P, Liu B, et al. Selective fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: diagnosis, natural history, and perinatal outcome[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(5): 1404.
Breathnach FM, Malone FD. Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2012, 36(3): 175-181.
Wang Y, Zeng H, Liu J, et al. Gestational hypertensive disease and birthweight discordance in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021: 1-9.
Miller J, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad AZ. Discordant twins: diagnosis, evaluation and management[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 206(1): 10-20.
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Simpson LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 208(1): 3-18.
Di Mascio D, Khalil A, D'Amico A, et al. Outcome of twin-twin transfusion syndrome according to Quintero stage of disease: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 56(6): 811-820.
徐丛剑,华克勤. 实用妇产科学(第4版)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:112-456.
Xu CJ, Hua KQ. Practice of obstetrics & gynecology (4th edition) [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2018: 112-456.
邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕. 实用新生儿学(第5版)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2019:390-1039.
Shao XM, Ye HM, Qiu XS. Practice of Neonatology (5th edition) [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2019: 390-1039.
中华医学会围产医学分会胎儿医学学组, 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 双胎妊娠临床处理指南(2020年更新)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2020,23(8):505-516.
Fetal Medicine Subgroup, Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Chinese Medical Association, SubgroupObstetrics, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for management of twin pregnancy (2020 update) [J]. Chin J Perinat Med, 2020, 23(8): 505-516.
WHO, CDC, ICBDSR. Birth defects surveillance: a manual for programme managers, second edition[M]. Geneva:World Health Organization, 2020: 2-172.
Cheong-See F, Schuit E, Arroyo-Manzano D, et al. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2016, 354:i4353.
Manuck TA, Rice MM, Bailit JL, et al. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 215(1): 101-103.
Coutinho NF, Domingues AP, Vide TM, et al. Monochorionic versus dichorionic twins: Are obstetric outcomes always different?[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016, 36(5): 598-601.
Rizzini N, Fratelli N, Negri B, et al. Chorionicity, birth weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in uncomplicated twin pregnancies delivered from 36 weeks[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2022, 271: 214-218.
Leduc L, Takser L, Rinfret D. Persistance of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005, 193(5): 1670-1675.
Park YH, Kim YN, Im DH, et al. Neonatal outcomes between discordant monochorionic and dichorionic twins[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021, 34(13): 2080-2088.
Breathnach FM, Mcauliffe FM, Geary M, et al. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 118(1): 94-103.
Jahanfar S, Lim K, Ovideo-Joekes E. Birth weight discordance and adverse perinatal outcomes[J]. J Perin Med, 2017, 45(5): 603-611.
Di Mascio D, Acharya G, Khalil A, et al. Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019, 98(10): 1245-1257.
Tan H, Wen SW, Fung Kee Fung K, et al. The distribution of intra-twin birth weight discordance and its association with total twin birth weight, gestational age, and neonatal mortality[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2005, 121(1): 27-33.
Fumagalli M, Schiavolin P, Bassi L, et al. The impact of twin birth on early neonatal outcomes[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2016, 33(1): 63-70.
Twin and Triplet Pregnancy[M]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2019: 46-50.
Cui H, Wang Z, Yu J, et al. Birthweight is an independent predictor of birth asphyxia in twins: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of 5337 Chinese twins[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 257: 106-113.
Boghossian NS, Saha S, Bell EF, et al. Birth weight discordance in very low birth weight twins: mortality, morbidity, and neurodevelopment[J]. J Perinatol, 2019, 39(9): 1229-1240.
Groene SG, Spekman JA, Te PA, et al. Respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia after fetal growth restriction: lessons from a natural experiment in identical twins[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2021, 32: 100725.
Sehgal A, Gwini SM, Menahem S, et al. Preterm growth restriction and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: the vascular hypothesis and related physiology[J]. J Physiol, 2019, 597(4): 1209-1220.
0
Views
8
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution