Effect of Ultrasound-guided Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block on The Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Sternotomy Cardiac Surgery

LIAO Yi; LI Qi; WANG Xiaoe; ZHAN Mingying; XIAO Li; CHEN Yu

doi:10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.2024.0322.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effect of Ultrasound-guided Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block on The Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Sternotomy Cardiac Surgery

Clinical Research | 更新时间：2024-04-15

- Effect of Ultrasound-guided Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block on The Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Sternotomy Cardiac Surgery
- Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences) Vol. 45, Issue 2, Pages: 297-309(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中山大学附属第一医院麻醉科，广东广州 510080
  2.广东省人民医院麻醉科，广东广州 519041
- 作者简介：
  
  CHEN Yu； E-mail： chen@mail.sysu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.2024.0322.001
  CLC： R654
- Published：20 March 2024，
  
  Received：12 February 2024，
  
  Accepted：18 March 2024
扫描看全文
廖怡,李琪,王晓娥等.超声引导浅层胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞对胸骨切开心脏手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J].中山大学学报（医学科学版）,2024,45(02):297-309.

LIAO Yi,LI Qi,WANG Xiaoe,et al.Effect of Ultrasound-guided Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block on The Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Sternotomy Cardiac Surgery[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(02):297-309.
廖怡,李琪,王晓娥等.超声引导浅层胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞对胸骨切开心脏手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J].中山大学学报（医学科学版）,2024,45(02):297-309. DOI： 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.2024.0322.001.

LIAO Yi,LI Qi,WANG Xiaoe,et al.Effect of Ultrasound-guided Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block on The Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Sternotomy Cardiac Surgery[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(02):297-309. DOI： 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.2024.0322.001.

摘要

目的

探究超声引导浅层胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞对胸骨切开心脏手术患者术后恢复质量和镇痛效果的影响。

方法

本研究共纳入64例胸骨切开心脏手术患者，随机分为接受浅层胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞使用罗哌卡因（罗哌卡因组）或生理盐水（生理盐水组）两组。主要研究指标为患者术后24 h恢复质量评分（QoR-15评分），其次为术后24 h疼痛评分和阿片药物使用情况。

结果

与生理盐水组比较，罗哌卡因组术后24 h QoR-15评分显著提高［（89.60±13.24）

（81.18±12.78），

=0.012］，静息数字疼痛评分显著降低［（3.03±0.72）

（4.26±0.93），

0.001］，咳嗽数字疼痛评分显著降低［（4.40±0.89）

（5.44±1.05），

0.001］。同时，罗哌卡因组患者术后24 h阿片药物使用总量明显减少［14.15 （4.95～30.00） mg

40.50 （19.25～68.18） mg，

=0.002］，补救镇痛需求亦明显减少［0.00 （0.00～0.00）mg

0.00 （0.00～100.00） mg，

=0.007］。

结论

超声引导浅层胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞可通过提升术后镇痛效果及减少阿片药物使用量，提高胸骨切开心脏手术患者术后24 h的总体恢复质量，利于术后早期康复。

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to explore the effect of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block on the quality of recovery and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing sternotomy cardiac surgery.

Methods

A total of 64 patients undergoing sternotomy cardiac surgery were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two groups： one group received a superficial parasternal intercostal plane block with ropivacaine （the ropivacaine group）， while the other was given normal saline （the normal saline group）. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 （QoR-15） score on postoperative day 1 in both groups， accompanied by a comparative analysis of the pain score and opioid usage.

Results

Compared with the normal saline group， the ropivacaine group exhibited a significantly higher QoR-15 score on postoperative day 1［（89.60±13.24）

（81.18±12.78），

=0.012］. The numerical rating scale at rest was significantly lower［（3.03±0.72）

（4.26±0.93），

0.001］， and the numerical rating scale during coughing was also significantly reduced ［（4.40±0.89）

（5.44±1.05），

0.001］. Concurrently， the cumulative morphine equivalent consumption during the initial 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in patients who were administered the ropivacaine ［14.15 （4.95～30.00） mg vs 40.50 （19.25～68.18） mg，

=0.002］， and there was also a notable decrease in the rescue analgesia ［0.00 （0.00～0.00） mg

0.00 （0.00～100.00） mg，

=0.007］.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block can significantly enhance the overall quality of recovery in patients undergoing sternotomy cardiac surgery on postoperative day 1. The technique contributes to improved postoperative analgesic effects and a reduction in opioid usage， thereby facilitating early postoperative recovery.

关键词

术后恢复质量胸骨切开心脏手术浅层胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞罗哌卡因术后镇痛

Keywords

quality of recoverysternotomy cardiac surgerysuperficial parasternal intercostal plane blockropivacainepostoperative analgesia

references

Mueller XM， Tinguely F， Tevaearai HT， et al. Pain location， distribution， and intensity after cardiac surgery［J］. Chest， 2000， 118（2）： 391-396.

Mazzeffi M， Khelemsky Y. Poststernotomy pain： a clinical review［J］. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth， 2011， 25（6）： 1163-1178.

Ziehm S， Rosendahl J， Barth J， et al. Psychological interventions for acute pain after open heart surgery［J］. Cochrane Database Syst Rev， 2017， 7（7）： CD009984.

Menefee LA， Frank ED， Doghramji K， et al. Self-reported sleep quality and quality of life for individuals with chronic pain conditions［J］. Clin J Pain， 2000， 16（4）： 290-297.

Ochroch J， Usman A， Kiefer J， et al. Reducing opioid use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery - preoperative， intraoperative， and critical care strategies［J］. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth， 2021， 35（7）： 2155-2165.

Wick EC， Grant MC， Wu CL. Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management with nonopioid analgesics and techniques： a review［J］. JAMA Surg， 2017， 152（7）： 691-697.

Engelman DT， Ben Ali W， Williams JB， et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery： enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations［J］. JAMA Surg， 2019， 154（8）： 755-766.

El-Boghdadly K， Wolmarans M， Stengel AD，et al. Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia： an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall， paraspinal， and chest wall blocks［J］. Reg Anesth Pain Med， 2021， 46（7）： 571-580.

Liu V， Mariano ER， Prabhakar C. Pecto-intercostal fascial block for acute poststernotomy pain： a case report［J］. A A Pract， 2018， 10（12）： 319-322.

Kumar AK， Chauhan S， Bhoi D， et al. Pectointercostal fascial block （PIFB） as a novel technique for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery［J］. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth， 2021， 35（1）： 116-122.

Zhang Y， Gong H， Zhan B， Chen S. Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery： a prospective randomized study［J］. BMC Anesthesiol， 2021， 21（1）： 175.

Khera T， Murugappan KR， Leibowitz A， et al. Ultrasound-guided pecto-intercostal fascial block for postoperative pain management in cardiac surgery： a prospective， randomized， placebo-controlled trial［J］. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth， 2021， 35（3）： 896-903.

Myles PS， Shulman MA， Reilly J， et al. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale： a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Br J Anaesth， 2022， 128（6）： 1029-1039.

Wessels E， Perrie H， Scribante J，et al. Quality of recovery in the perioperative setting： a narrative review［J］. J Clin Anesth， 2022， 78： 110685.

Stark PA， Myles PS， Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score： the QoR-15［J］. Anesthesiology， 2013， 118（6）： 1332-1340.

Myles PS， Hunt JO， Fletcher H， et al. Remifentanil， fentanyl， and cardiac surgery： a double-blinded， randomised， controlled trial of costs and outcomes［J］. Anesth Analg， 2002， 95（4）： 805-812.

Jeanneteau A， Demarquette A， Blanchard-Daguet A， et al. Effect of superficial and deep parasternal blocks on recovery after cardiac surgery： study protocol for a randomized controlled trial［J］. Trials， 2023， 24（1）： 444.

Myles PS， Myles DB， Galagher W， et al. Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales［J］. Anesthesiology， 2016， 125（1）： 39-45.

Myles PS， Myles DB. An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale［J］. Anesthesiology， 2021， 135（5）： 934-935.

Chazapis M， Walker EM， Rooms MA， et al. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery［J］. Br J Anaesth， 2016， 116（2）： 241–248.

Mao Y， Guo J， Yuan J， et al. Quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam in patients' undergoing urologic surgery： a randomized controlled trial comparing remimazolam with propofol［J］. Drug Des Devel Ther， 2022， 16：1199-1209.

Wu Y， Chen Z， Yao C， et al. Effect of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery， the gastrointestinal function， inflammatory cytokines of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery： a randomized trial［J］. Sci Rep， 2023， 13（1）： 17661.

Choi JY， Lee HS， Kim JY， et al. Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery： a randomized non-inferiority trial［J］. J Clin Anesth， 2022， 82： 110955.

Kukreja P， Uppal V， Kofskey AM， et al. Quality of recovery after pericapsular nerve group （PENG） block for primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia： a randomised controlled observer-blinded trial［J］. Br J Anaesth， 2023， 130（6）： 773-779.

Eochagain AN， Moorthy A， O'Gara Á， et al. Ultrasound-guided， continuous erector spinae plane （ESP） block in minimally invasive thoracic surgery-comparing programmed intermittent bolus （PIB） vs continuous infusion on quality of recovery and postoperative respiratory function： a double-blinded randomised controlled trial［J］. Trials， 2022， 23（1）： 792.

Myles PS， Myles DB， Galagher W， et al. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale： the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state［J］. Br J Anaesth， 2017， 118（3）： 424-429.

Kogan A， Eidelman LA， Raanani E， et al. Nausea and vomiting after fast-track cardiac anaesthesia［J］. Br J Anaesth， 2003， 91（2）： 214-217.

Sawatzky JA， Rivet M， Ariano RE， et al. Post-operative nausea and vomiting in the cardiac surgery population： who is at risk？［J］. Heart Lung， 2014， 43（6）： 550-554.

Hoerner E， Gasteiger L， Ortler M， et al. The impact of dexamethasone as a perineural additive to ropivacaine for PECS II blockade in patients undergoing unilateral radical mastectomy -a prospective， randomized， controlled and double-blinded trial［J］. J Clin Anesth， 2022， 77： 110622.

Desai N， Kirkham KR， Albrecht E. Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral regional anaesthesia： a narrative review［J］. Anaesthesia， 2021， 76Suppl 1： 100-109.

McCann ME. Liposomal bupivacaine［J］. Anesthesiology， 2021， 134（2）： 139-142.

Li Q， Zhan M， Liao Y， et al. Ultrasound-guided bilateral continuous superficial parasternal intercostal plane block relieves postoperative pain after pediatric heart transplantation［J］. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth， 2023， 37（11）： 2314-2317.

Zhang J， Luo F， Zhang X， et al. Ultrasound-guided continuous parasternal intercostal block relieves postoperative pain after open cardiac surgery： a case series［J］. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth， 2022， 36（7）： 2051-2054.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Analgesic Efficacy of Pre-emptive Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Efficacy of Morphine Rotation to Hydromorphone in Postoperative Analgesia

Effect of Hydromorphone for Postoperative Analgesia on Residual Carbon Dioxide during Recovery after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Related Author

赖洁兰

薛瑞峰

康世暘

曾维安

林世清

陈兰兰

孙来保

王益敏

Related Institution

Department of Anesthesiology，Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

The First Affiliated Hospital，Sun Yat-sen University

Lanzhou University Second Hospital

Postal code：510080
Tel：020-87331643，87330827 Email：xbmed@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010802024621
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰