Comparison of the Recent Efficacy of Robot-assisted and Thoracic Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Mckeown Radical Resection of Esophageal Cancer based on Propensity Score Matching

ZHANG Tianci; YUAN Ligong; TIAN Jieyong; LI Xinhao; HUANG Zhining; WU Xianning

doi:10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.20240312.003

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison of the Recent Efficacy of Robot-assisted and Thoracic Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Mckeown Radical Resection of Esophageal Cancer based on Propensity Score Matching

Clinical Research | 更新时间：2024-04-15

- Comparison of the Recent Efficacy of Robot-assisted and Thoracic Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Mckeown Radical Resection of Esophageal Cancer based on Propensity Score Matching
- Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences) Vol. 45, Issue 2, Pages: 310-318(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国科学技术大学第一附属医院胸外科,安徽合肥 230001
  2.河北北方医学院基础医学院,河北张家口 075000
  3.安徽医科大学附属省立医院胸外科,安徽合肥 230032
- 作者简介：
  
  WU Xianning； E-mail： xianning.wu@fsyy.ustc.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.20240312.003
  CLC： R655.4
- Published：20 March 2024，
  
  Received：16 November 2023，
  
  Accepted：21 February 2024
扫描看全文
张天赐,袁立功,田界勇等.基于倾向评分匹配的机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜微创三切口食管癌根治术近期疗效比较[J].中山大学学报（医学科学版）,2024,45(02):310-318.

ZHANG Tianci,YUAN Ligong,TIAN Jieyong,et al.Comparison of the Recent Efficacy of Robot-assisted and Thoracic Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Mckeown Radical Resection of Esophageal Cancer based on Propensity Score Matching[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(02):310-318.
张天赐,袁立功,田界勇等.基于倾向评分匹配的机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜微创三切口食管癌根治术近期疗效比较[J].中山大学学报（医学科学版）,2024,45(02):310-318. DOI： 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.20240312.003.

ZHANG Tianci,YUAN Ligong,TIAN Jieyong,et al.Comparison of the Recent Efficacy of Robot-assisted and Thoracic Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Mckeown Radical Resection of Esophageal Cancer based on Propensity Score Matching[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(02):310-318. DOI： 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.20240312.003.

摘要

目的

探讨机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术（RAMIE）和胸腹腔镜联合微创食管癌切除术（MIE）的安全性与有效性。

方法

回顾性分析中国科学技术大学第一附属医院胸外科 2021年 4月至 2022年 12月收治的188例接受微创Mckeown食管癌切除术的患者资料。其中RAMIE组69例，男性49例，女性20例，年龄（67.2±7.2）岁；MIE组119例，男性89例，女性30例，年龄（69.1±7.0）岁。采用倾向性评分匹配法（PSM）对两组患者进行1∶1匹配，匹配后 RAMIE组58例，MIE组58例。采用

检验、Pearson

检验、Fisher’s精确检验等比较两组患者术中情况和术后并发症发生率。

结果

经过PSM处理后，两组患者基线资料无明显差异。RAMIE组和MIE组在手术时间、术后带管天数、淋巴结清扫总数方面无明显差异（

＜0.05）；在术中出血、左喉返淋巴结清扫数目方面RAMIE组优于MIE组，差异有统计学意义（

＜0.05）；MIE组在淋巴结清扫总站数方面更优（

＜0.05）。在术后并发症方面RAMIE组和MIE组两组数据差异无统计学意义（

＞0.05）

结论

RAMIE近期疗效与MIE食管癌切除术相当；机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术可以减少术中出血同时在淋巴结清扫中尤其是在喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫中更具优势。

Abstract

Objective

To explore the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy （robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy， RAMIE） and thoracic laparoscopy combined with minimally invasive esophageal resection （minimal invasive esophagectomy， MIE）.

Methods

The data of 188 patients treated with Da Vinci robot assisted minimally invasive esophageal resection （RAMIE） from April 2021 to December 2022 were analyzed. In the RAMIE group， 69 patients， 49 males and 20 female， age （67.2 ± 7.2）； 119 in the MIME group， respectively， 89 males and 30 female， age （69.1 ± 7.0）. At 1 ∶ 1， including 58 patients in the RAMIE group and 58 patients in the MIE group. The

-test， Wilcoxon rank-sum test，

test， and so on.

Results

After PSM treatment， the clinical data between the two groups. There was no significant difference in operation time， postoperative tube days， and total number of lymph node dissection between the RAMIE and MIE groups （

0.05）； the RAMIE group was better in terms of intraoperative bleeding and the MIE group， statistically significant （

0.05）； the MIE group was better in drainage flow and lymph node dissection for three days （

0.05）. In terms of postoperative complications， there was no statistical difference between RAMIE and MIE groups （

0.05）.

Conclusion

The recent efficacy of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is comparable to that of thoracic laparoscopy and minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy； robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy can reduce intraoperative bleeding and have more advantages in left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection.

关键词

食管癌达芬奇机器系统微创食管癌手术倾向性匹配评分胸腹腔镜联合微创食管癌切除术

Keywords

esophageal cancerDa Vinci machine systemminimally invasive esophageal cancer surgerytendency matching scoreminimal invasive esophagectomy

references

Bray F， Ferlay J， Soerjomataram I， et al. Global cancer statistics 2018： GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries［J］. CA Cancer J Clin， 2018， 68（6）： 394-424.

Chen W， Zheng R， Baade PD， et al. Cancer statistics in China， 2015［J］. CA Cancer J Clin， 2016， 66（2）： 115-132.

李印，秦建军. 中国临床肿瘤学会（CSCO）食管癌诊治指南2020版外科领域更新要点解读［J］. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志， 2020， 27（8）： 857-859.

Li Y，Qin JJ .The 2020 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Cancer by Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology［J］. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg， 2020， 27（8）： 857-859.

Grimminger PP， Tagkalos E， Hadzijusufovic E， et al. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises［J］. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg， 2019， 67（7）： 589-596.

Park S， Hwang Y， Lee HJ， et al. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma［J］. J Thorac Dis， 2016， 8（10）： 2853-2861.

Watson TJ. Robotic esophagectomy： is it an advance and what is the future？［J］. Ann Thorac Surg， 2008， 85（2）： S757-759.

Boone J， Schipper ME， Moojen WA， et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer［J］. Br J Surg， 2009， 96（8）： 878-886.

Zhou J， Xu J， Chen L， et al. McKeown esophagectomy： robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive technique-systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Dis Esophagus， 2022， 35（10）：doac011.

Fujita T， Sato K， Ozaki A， et al. Propensity-matched analysis of the short-term outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy in thoracic esophageal cancer［J］. World J Surg， 2022， 46（8）： 1926-1933.

Yang Y， Zhang X， Li B， et al. Robot-assisted esophagectomy （RAE） versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy （MIE） for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma： protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial （RAMIE trial， robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy）［J］. BMC Cancer， 2019， 19（1）： 608.

Zhang Y， Dong D， Cao Y， et al. Robotic versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer： a meta-analysis［J］. Ann Surg， 2023， 278（1）： 39-50.

Kulkarni A， Mulchandani JG， Sadat MS， et al. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer： a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches［J］. J Robot Surg， 2022， 16（6）： 1289-1297.

Deng HY， Luo J， Li SX， et al. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma？ a propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes［J］. Dis Esophagus， 2019， 32（7）： doy110.

Babic B， Müller DT， Jung JO， et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy （RAMIE） vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy： propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center［J］. Surg Endosc， 2022， 36（10）： 7747-7755.

张晓彬，杨煜，叶波，等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助与胸腹腔镜联合辅助食管癌根治术的疗效分析［J］. 中华消化外科杂志， 2017， 16（8）： 844-849.

Zhang XB ，Yang L， Ye B ， et al The efficacy analysis of da Vinci robotic surgical system assisted with thoracic laparoscopy assisted radical resection of esophageal cancer［J］. Chin J Digest Surg， 2017， 16（8）： 844-849.

Suda K， Ishida Y， Kawamura Y， et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position： technical report and short-term outcomes［J］. World J Surg， 2012， 36（7）： 1608-1616.

李刚，张嘉妮，沈旭，等. 达芬奇机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜辅助微创食管癌切除术临床效果的系统评价与Meta分析［J］. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志， 2022， 29（9）：1181-1188 .

Li G ， Zhang JN， Shen X， et al. Systematic evaluation and Meta-analysis of the clinical effect of Da Vinci robot-assisted and thoracic laparoscopy-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy［J］.Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg， 2022， 29（9）： 1181-1188.

Chen J， Liu Q， Zhang X， et al. Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with extended two-field lymph node dissection for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma［J］. J Thorac Dis， 2019， 11（9）： 3874-3880.

Nakanoko T， Kimura Y， Natsugoe K， et al. Left recurrent nerve lymph node dissection in robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer without esophageal traction［J］. World J Surg Oncol， 2023， 21（1）： 223.

Betzler J， Elfinger L， Büttner S， et al. Robot-assisted esophagectomy may improve perioperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer - a single-center experience［J］. Front Oncol， 2022， 12： 966321.

Tagkalos E， Van Der Sluis PC， Berlth F， et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma， a randomized controlled trial （ROBOT-2 trial）［J］. BMC Cancer， 2021， 21（1）： 1060.

Jung JO， De Groot EM， Kingma BF， et al. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy： an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome［J］. Surg Endosc， 2023， 37（6）： 4466-4477.

Matsunaga T， Shishido Y， Saito H， et al. Impact of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer： a propensity score-matched short-term analysis［J］. Yonago Acta Med， 2023， 66（2）： 239-245.

Han Y， Zhang Y， Zhang W， et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy［J］. Dis Esophagus， 2022， 35（2）：doab026.

Müssle B， Kirchberg J， Buck N， et al. Drainless robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy-randomized controlled trial （RESPECT）［J］. Trials， 2023， 24（1）： 303.

Park SY， Kim DJ， Kang DR， et al. Learning curve for robotic esophagectomy and dissection of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes for esophageal cancer［J］. Dis Esophagus， 2017， 30（12）： 1-9.

Van Der Sluis PC， Ruurda JP， Van Der Horst S， et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy： results from 312 cases［J］. Ann Thorac Surg， 2018， 106（1）： 264-271.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Metabonomics-based Study of Metabolic Characteristics and Clinical Significance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Propensity Score-based Comparison of Long-term Outcomes with Concurrent DDP/5-Fu vs Docetaxel/DDP for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

Related Author

LI Xinhao

ZHANG Jing-jing

FU Jian-hua

LIANG Yi

WEN Jing

YANG Hong

HUANG Wei-zhao

Related Institution

Department of Thoracic， Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center， State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China， Guangdong Institute of Esophageal Cancer

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery， Zhongshan People's Hospital

Department of Radiotherapy， Zhongshan People's Hospital

Postal code：510080
Tel：020-87331643，87330827 Email：xbmed@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010802024621
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰