浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中山大学附属第五医院放射科,广东 珠海 519000
2.南方医科大学珠江医院影像诊断科,广东 广州 510280
LIANG Mingzhu;E-mail: liangmzhu5@mail.sysu.edu.cn
HONG Guobin;E-mail: honggb@smu.edu.cn
Published:20 May 2024,
Received:10 April 2024,
Accepted:13 May 2024
扫 描 看 全 文
李禧萌,李文娟,张珂等.T1灰阶反转图评估中轴型脊柱关节炎骶髂关节结构性病变的价值[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2024,45(03):412-419.
LI Ximeng,LI Wenjuan,ZHANG Ke,et al.Grey-scale Reversed T1-weighted MRI for Detecting Structural Lesions of the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(03):412-419.
李禧萌,李文娟,张珂等.T1灰阶反转图评估中轴型脊柱关节炎骶髂关节结构性病变的价值[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2024,45(03):412-419. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240515.004.
LI Ximeng,LI Wenjuan,ZHANG Ke,et al.Grey-scale Reversed T1-weighted MRI for Detecting Structural Lesions of the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2024,45(03):412-419. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).20240515.004.
目的
2
探讨 T
1
灰阶反转(rT
1
)图对中轴型脊柱关节炎(ax-SpA)骶髂关节结构性病变的诊断价值。
方法
2
回顾性搜集我院 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 12 月在 1 周内行骶髂关节MRI 及 CT 检查并符合 ax-SpA 诊断标准的患者52例, 共计104 个骶髂关节。两名放射科医师基于常规T
1
WI、rT
1
、T
1
WI + rT
1
三组图像,分别评估ax-SpA骶髂关节结构病变:骨侵蚀、骨质硬化、关节间隙改变,在斜冠状位图像上将骶髂关节分为前、中、后 3 部分,每部分分骶面、髂面,共6个区域,并按拟定评分规则对上述 3 种结构性病变进行评分,其中1名医师间隔1月后再次进行评分。由第3名肌骨影像专科医师同样使用上述方法评估CT图像作为参考标准。使用组内相关系数(ICC)分析医师间及医师内分别评估各病变评分一致性;采用Friedman
M
检验比较三组图像对各病变评分与 CT评分的差异;以 CT为参考标准,采用诊断性试验分析计算三组图像诊断骨侵蚀、骨质硬化及关节间隙改变的准确率、灵敏度、特异度,并采用McNemar 检验比较rT
1
、T
1
WI + rT
1
与T
1
WI的差异。
结果
2
三组图像评分各类结构病变医师间、医师内一致性好,其中以T
1
WI + rT
1
的一致性最优,评估各类病变ICC≥0.856 95%CI(0.794,0.900),优于rT
1
及T
1
WI[ rT
1
:ICC≥0.819 95%CI(0.745,0.874),T
1
WI:ICC≥0.754 95%CI(0.656,0.827)];T
1
WI + rT
1
对各病变的评分结果与CT评分结果相当, rT
1
对骨侵蚀、关节间隙改变评分与CT相当(
P
>0.05)。相较T
1
WI,T
1
WI + rT
1
诊断各病变均有更高的准确率及灵敏度(准确率
骨侵蚀
:90.3%
vs
76. 9%;灵敏度
骨侵蚀
: 91.6%
vs
76.1%;准确率
骨质硬化
:89.4%
vs
80.8%;灵敏度
骨质硬化
: 84.6%
vs
73.9%;准确率
关节间隙改变
: 86.5%
vs
73.1%;灵敏度
关节间隙改变
: 84.9%
vs
60.4%;
P
<
0.05);rT
1
提高了对骨侵蚀、关节间隙改变诊断的准确性和灵敏度(准确率
骨侵蚀
: 87.5%
vs
76.9%;灵敏度
骨侵蚀
: 88.7%
vs
76.1%;准确率
关节间隙改变
: 85.6%
vs
73.1%;灵敏度
关节间隙改变
: 83.0%
vs
60.4%;
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
rT
1
能提高ax-SpA骶髂关节结构性病变的诊断效能,T
1
WI + rT
1
效能更优。
Objective
2
To analyze the value of grey-scale reversed T
1
-weighted (rT
1
) MRI in the detection of structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA).
Methods
2
Fifty-two ax-SpA patients who underwent both MRI and CT in our hospital within a week from February 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively included. Both sacral and iliac side of each SIJ on oblique coronal images were divided into anterior, middle and posterior portion. Two radiologists reviewed independently three groups of MRI including T1-weighted imaging (T
1
WI), rT
1
and T
1
WI + rT
1
images to evaluate the structural lesions like erosions, sclerosis and joint space changes in each of t
he 6 regions of the SIJ. One of the radiologist did the evaluation again one month later. CT images were scored for lesions by a third radiologist and served as the reference standard. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to test the inter- and intra-reader agreement for the assessment of SIJ lesions. A Friedman test was performed to compare the lesion results of MRI
and CT image findings. We examined the diagnostic performance [accuracy, sensitivity (SE) and specificity] of different groups of MRI in the detection of lesions by using diagnostic test. A McNemar test was used to compare the differences of three groups of MRI findings.
Results
2
CT showed erosions in 71 joints, sclerosis in 65 and joint space changes in 53. Good inter-and intra-reader agreements were found in three groups of MRI images for the assessment of lesions, with the best agreement in T
1
WI + rT
1
. There were no difference between T
1
WI + rT
1
and CT for the assessment of all lesions, nor between rT
1
and CT for the assessment of erosions and joint space changes (
P
>
0.05). T
1
WI + rT
1
yielded better accuracy and SE than T
1
WI in detection of all lesions (Accuracy
erosions
: 90.3%
vs
76. 9%; SE
erosions
: 91.6%
vs
76.1%; Accuracy
sclerosis
: 89.4%
vs
80.8%; SE
sclerosis
: 84.6%
vs
73.9%; Accuracy
joint space changes
: 86.5%
vs
73.1%; SE
joint space changes
: 84.9%
vs
60.4%;
P
<
0.05). rT
1
yielded better accuracy and SE than T
1
WI in detection of erosions and joint space changes (Accuracy
erosions
: 87.5%
vs
76.9%; SE
erosions
: 88.7%
vs
76.1%; Accuracy
joint space changes
: 85.6%
vs
73.1%; SE
joint space changes
: 83.0%
vs
60.4%;
P
<
0.05).
Conclusions
2
In the detection of SIJ structural lesions in ax-SpA, rT
1
improves the diagnostic performance and T
1
WI + rT
1
is more superior to others.
中轴型脊柱关节炎骶髂关节炎结构性病变磁共振成像灰阶反转
axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA)sacroiliac joint (SIJ)structural lesionsMRIgrey-scale reversed
Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis[J]. The Lancet, 2017, 390(10089): 73-84.
Linden SVD, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis[J]. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1984, 27(4): 361-368.
Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG, østergaard M, et al. MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with spondyloarthritis: an update of definitions and validation by the ASAS MRI working group[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019, 78(11): 1550-1558.
Diekhoff T, Eshed I, Radny F, et al. Choose wisely: imaging for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2022, 81(2): 237-242.
曹立坤, 王沄, 马壮飞, 等. 深度学习重建算法在超重者低剂量骶髂关节CT中的价值[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学, 2024, 33(1): 37-43.
Cao LK, Wang Y, Ma ZF, et al. The value of deep learning reconstruction algorithms in low-dose sacroiliac joint CT of overweight individuals[J]. Diagn Imag Intervent Radiol, 2024, 33(1): 37-43.
Diekhoff T, Hermann KA, Greese J, et al. Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 76(9): 1502-1508.
Diekhoff T, Hermann K, Lambert RG. Future of low-dose computed tomography and dual-energy computed tomography in axial spondyloarthritis[J]. Curr Rheumatol Rep, 2022, 24(6): 198-205.
Jans LBO, Chen M, Elewaut D, et al. MRI-based synthetic CT in the detection of structural lesions in patients with suspected sacroiliitis: comparison with MRI[J]. Radiology, 2021, 298(2): 343-349.
Diekhoff T, Greese J, Sieper J, et al. Improved detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints on MRI with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE): results from the SIMACT study[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77(11): 1585-1589.
Li Y, Xiong Y, Hou B, et al. Comparison of zero echo time MRI with T1-weighted fast spin echo for the recognition of sacroiliac joint structural lesions using CT as the reference standard[J]. European Radiology, 2022, 32(6): 3963-3973.
窦晗, 王晓明. 磁共振零回波成像应用进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2022, 13(2): 167-170.
Dou H, Wang X. Current state-of-the-art of MRI zero echo time technique[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(2): 167-170.
陈志晔, 胡敏, 王燕一. 颞下颌关节骨关节炎的MRI成像诊断[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2022, 57(6): 660-664.
Chen ZY, Hu M, Wang YY. MRI diagnosis of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis [J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2022, 57(6): 660-664.
Proft F, Poddubnyy D. Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis: recent insights and impact of new classification criteria[J]. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis, 2018, 10(5-6): 129-139.
Poddubnyy D, Gaydukova I, Hermann KG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to conventional radiographs for detection of chronic structural changes in sacroiliac joints in axial spondyloarthritis[J]. J Rheumatol, 2013, 40(9): 1557-1565.
王炎焱,黄烽. 脊柱关节炎早期诊断的机遇与挑战:磁共振成像判断骶髂关节炎的利与弊[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2021, 60(3): 187-191.
Wang YY, Huang F. Opportunities and challenges in early diagnosis of spondyloarthritis: the advantages and disadvantages of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing sacroiliac arthritis[J]. Chin J Intern Med, 2021, 60(3): 187-191.
Jans L, Coeman L, Van Praet L, et al. How sensitive and specific are MRI features of sacroiliitis for diagnosis of spondyloarthritis[J]. JBR-BTR, 2015, 97(4): 202-205.
Weber U, Pedersen SJ, Ostergaard M, et al. Can erosions on MRI of the sacroiliac joints be reliably detected in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? a cross-sectional study[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2012, 14(3): R124.
Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KA, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2009, 68(10): 1520-1527.
Bakker PAC, van den Berg R, Lenczner G, et al. Can we use structural lesions seen on MRI of the sacroiliac joints reliably for the classification of patients according to the ASAS axial spondyloarthritis criteria? Data from the DESIR cohort[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 76(2): 392-398.
0
Views
6
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution